Administration & Finance (A&F) Committee Meeting Minutes

Memorandum for the Record

Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization

January 19, 2023, Meeting

9:00 AM–9:40 AM, Zoom Video Conferencing Platform

Brian Kane, Chair, representing the MBTA Advisory Board.

Decisions

The Administration & Finance Committee agreed to the following:

Meeting Agenda

1.    Introductions

See attendance on page 6.

2.    Public Comments  

There were none.

3.    Action Item: Approval of November 17, 2022, A&F Meeting Minutes

Documents posted to the MPO meeting calendar

  1. November 17, 2022, Meeting Minutes (pdf)
  2. November 17, 2022, Meeting Minutes (html)

Vote

A motion to approve the minutes of the meeting of November 17, 2022, was made by the Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) (Eric Bourassa) and seconded by the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) (Derek Krevat). The motion carried.

4.    Update on State Fiscal Year (SFY) 2022 Audited Financials—Hiral Gandhi, Director of Finance and Operations

Hiral Gandhi, Director of Finance and Operations at the Boston Region MPO, shared State Fiscal Year (SFY) 2022 audited financials. H. Ghandi stated that the SFY 2022 revenue was $5,667,324, accounting for 85 percent of the projected revenue. SFY 2022 expenses were $4,056,317, accounting for 90 percent of the projected expenses. SFY 2022 concluded with a deficit of $388,993. The administrative overhead rate for SFY 2022 was 122.80 percent. Overhead was originally projected to be 109.09 percent, leading to a difference that was 13.71 percent higher than the projected overhead rate.

H. Gandhi noted that the Boston Region MPO has concluded the last three years in a deficit. H. Gandhi stated that if audited, in years ending with a surplus, the MPO would have to return any excess funds to the relevant client agencies. Should the year end in a deficit, the MPO must ask clients for additional money to cover its contracts at the end of the year. Both processes require an additional audit. The ideal financial state for the MPO is to end the SFY in neither a surplus nor a deficit.

H. Gandhi stated that a key driver of SFY 2022’s deficit is the discrepancy between the projected and actual staff count. Revenue is based on the number of staff charging contracts and is not officially recognized until staff has begun working on a contract, processed it in their timesheets, and the client has paid the MPO. Due to this process, cost savings from being short-staffed are not reflected, as revenue cannot be counted if a project has not been worked on. The SFY 2022 staff estimate was 58 employees, whereas the actual number was approximately 50. This was driven by a higher-than-expected turnover rate. SFY 2022 had 13 staff members leave the MPO and eight staff members join. Additional recruitment time prevents staff from charging their time towards contracts. H. Gandhi noted that an additional increase in expenses for SFY 2022 was the result of a cyberattack, leading to unanticipated administrative time.  

Table 1
SFY 2022 Draft Audited Financials

 

SFY 2022

Projected

Actual

Percent of Projection

Revenue

$6,704,650

$5,667,324

85%

Expenses

$6,704,650

$6,056,317

90%

SFY = State Fiscal Year.


 

Table 2

SFY 2022 Overhead

 

SFY 2022

Projected

Actual

Difference

Overhead Rate

109.09%

122.80%

13.71% more than projected

SFY = State Fiscal Year.

Discussion

B. Kane stated that not being able to recognize revenue until a project has been charged is a confusing way to run an organization. He asked about the benefits of the revenue tracking system, especially compared to the system used by other state-employed organizations, where a sum of money is allocated to the organization at the beginning of the SFY. He shared his desire to find a way for the MPO to have access to manageable revenue to promote resilience against unexpected events within the MPO.

E. Bourassa shared that the MAPC encounters similar accounting issues, where the agency must charge to contracts, acting similarly to a consulting firm. MAPC’s SFY 2022 overhead rate was higher than projected as well, with turnover being a factor. E. Bourassa responded to B. Kane that the MPO is funded through federal dollars in a reimbursement program, instead of the money being provided upfront.

Tegin Teich confirmed the latter point that E. Bourassa made. T. Teich added that an additional nuance facing the MPO is that the federal government does allow contract funds to rollover from year to year, but this also occurs through a reimbursement program. However, this is not a practice that occurs in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

Lenard Diggins, representing the Regional Transportation Advisory Council, asked what the consequences are of deviating from projected revenue and expenses. H. Gandhi stated that according to contracts, a separate audit with clients is required to either charge an additional balance to reduce the deficit, or repay clients any additional funds, ideally resulting in a balanced budget. Historically these audits have not occurred.

T. Teich added that the deficit does not directly match the overhead rate. In addition, the MPO’s budget will always have a ceiling of expected contract amounts within the agency.

5.    Update on State Fiscal Year (SFY) 2023 Operating Budget—Hiral Gandhi, Director of Finance and Operations

H. Gandhi presented the SFY 2023 Operating Budget for the remainder of the SFY. She noted that month to month, there is volatility with the revenue and expenses, leading to some months ending in a surplus and others in a deficit. The next six months have some large expenses, but the MPO is still on track with the year-end projections. Monitoring will continue and expenses will be adjusted as needed. An example of this would be cutting back on administrative tasks, should the number of staff continue to not match the projected number. The current expected year-end surplus is $20,033.

H. Gandhi compared projected versus actual revenue for SFY 2023 to date. The MPO is projected to charge approximately $3.5 million through the second quarter, the actual amount charged is 84 percent of that. A similar analysis was made for SFY 2023 expenses, where the projected expenses were approximately $3.5 million and the actual expenses for the second quarter were 83 percent of the projected.

Strategies that H. Gandhi shared to maintain a balanced budget include increased attention to recruitment, a salary compensation market-level refresh, and spreading out major expenses throughout the year.

In SFY 2023 to date, the MPO has onboarded 10 new employees and offboarded seven employees. Many of the offboarded employees were anticipated to enter retirement in the same year.

Table 3
SFY 2023 Monthly Summary

 

 

July

August

September

October

November

December

Total

Revenue

$444,541

$472,250

$494,745

$491,010

$507,210

$491,504

$2,901,260

Expenses

$489,932

$448,606

$522,458

$471,819

$460,750

$487,661

$2,881,226

Surplus/Deficit

($45,391)

$23,643

($27,713)

$19,191

$46,460

$3,843

$20,033

SFY = State Fiscal Year.


 

Discussion

L. Diggins asked if the staff that was offboarded were planned retirements. H. Gandhi responded that this is not the case for all of them. The SFY 2023 budget accounted for three or four employees retiring.

L. Diggins asked how the MPO prioritizes work when it is understaffed. T. Teich responded that primary priorities are to complete required MPO work, with recruitment efforts focusing on filling core staff roles working on programs for the MPO. Any challenges with fulfilling the expected workload will be communicated with the MPO Board.

L. Diggins asked how the frequency of MPO and Committee meetings affect the overhead rate, as meetings have increased in recent years. T. Teich stated that meetings do affect overhead, leading to caution being taken when determining what can be accomplished year to year. Meetings associated with MPO Board activities are MPO-funded work, so staff-support of Board meetings does not count as overhead.

B. Kane stated his support of spreading out expenses over a full year and that it is a similar approach that the MBTA Advisory Board takes.

6.    Members’ Items

B. Kane stated that a calendar is in the works to determine a schedule for the A&F Committee over the next few months to continue work on the Operations Plan and other federal reports.

7.    Adjourn

The meeting ended at 9:45 AM.


 

Attendance

Members

Representatives

and Alternates

City of Boston (Boston Transportation Department)

Bill Conroy

Massachusetts Department of Transportation

Derek Krevat

MBTA Advisory Board

Brian Kane

Metropolitan Area Planning Council

Eric Bourassa

Regional Transportation Advisory Council

Lenard Diggins

 

Other Attendees

Affiliation

Jon Seward

 

 

MPO Staff/Central Transportation Planning Staff

Tegin Teich, Executive Director

Silva Ayvazyan

Jonathan Church

Annette Demchur

Hiral Gandhi

Ethan Lapointe

Erin Maguire

Srilekha Murthy

Gina Perille

Sam Taylor

 


 

The Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) operates its programs, services, and activities in compliance with federal nondiscrimination laws including Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VI), the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, and related statutes and regulations. Title VI prohibits discrimination in federally assisted programs and requires that no person in the United States of America shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin (including limited English proficiency), be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity that receives federal assistance. Related federal nondiscrimination laws administered by the Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, or both, prohibit discrimination on the basis of age, sex, and disability. The Boston Region MPO considers these protected populations in its Title VI Programs, consistent with federal interpretation and administration. In addition, the Boston Region MPO provides meaningful access to its programs, services, and activities to individuals with limited English proficiency, in compliance with U.S. Department of Transportation policy and guidance on federal Executive Order 13166.

The Boston Region MPO also complies with the Massachusetts Public Accommodation Law, M.G.L. c 272 sections 92a, 98, 98a, which prohibits making any distinction, discrimination, or restriction in admission to, or treatment in a place of public accommodation based on race, color, religious creed, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, disability, or ancestry. Likewise, the Boston Region MPO complies with the Governor's Executive Order 526, section 4, which requires that all programs, activities, and services provided, performed, licensed, chartered, funded, regulated, or contracted for by the state shall be conducted without unlawful discrimination based on race, color, age, gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, religion, creed, ancestry, national origin, disability, veteran's status (including Vietnam-era veterans), or background.

A complaint form and additional information can be obtained by contacting the MPO or at http://www.bostonmpo.org/mpo_non_discrimination. To request this information in a different language or in an accessible format, please contact

Title VI Specialist
Boston Region MPO
10 Park Plaza, Suite 2150
Boston, MA 02116
civilrights@ctps.org

By Telephone:
857.702.3700 (voice)

For people with hearing or speaking difficulties, connect through the state MassRelay service:

·       Relay Using TTY or Hearing Carry-over: 800.439.2370

·       Relay Using Voice Carry-over: 866.887.6619

·       Relay Using Text to Speech: 866.645.9870

For more information, including numbers for Spanish speakers, visit https://www.mass.gov/massrelay.